New Video Dropping Today

Hey Members, Welcome. New Video dropping today on a rarely spoken about, behind the curtain kind of thing. Its an analysis of the Federal Rule 11 Sanctions Motion that parties file against another party if they have pattern of filing bs documents or pleadings. The video potentially could be very boring to watch but hang in there until the end when there is some fun stuff I do. The Motion was filed against me and my client by a debt collector we are suing in Federal Court. It is rare to do. Completely rarer is it being filed at the beginning of the case as the collector here is. Possibly because I am filing the action in Federal court against the attorney for the company that sued my client and not just the collection agency. What the attorney did was that bad and warranted his being sued.

Todays video (again, could be boriing but hang in there) is a rarely filed motion and rarer still is the chance it will succeed. It is only if there is a long pattern of bad filings by a party that the motion will have a chance for success. In the case on the video, the case just started so there is no outcome to point to yet. No one brings a Motion for Santions under Rule 11 until the end of the case as there will be proof of you losing that you can show the court is proof the case is santionable. Ironically too is that it is filed to claim my client filed a pleading based upon an improper purpose or as a form of harassment of the debt collector in the case I am litigating. Tthe Video I am dropping today shows that the Rule 11 Motion was filed to harass me and my client-it has no basis of fact or law and laughingly, is based upon one of my videos and the videos are quoted in the Motion. It is all attached to the Video today along with word documents if you are ever in the same place.

Later on when I advise the debt collector who filed the Sanctions Motion that I am deposing him (after he agreed to it weeks earlier) and putting the deposition on my membership site for the education and instruction of my members, the attorney I am deposing now wants me not to involve the membership site-the one he watches and uses against me in the Sanctions Motion. (You can't make this up). The motion against me and my client is so improper but the collector knows I now have to deal with it and have it over our head. Believe me, I am not going to forget that when I depose the guy-I will be a gentleman. Incredibly, the attorney is now begging for me not to put the video of him being deposed on my site out of a professional courtesy to him-after the filing of a very hostile motion against me that you will see in the video , has no basis or reason to be filed.

Hope this and the video are not too boring. In the video at the end, look at the emails from the attorney whinning about being the subject of the deposition and asking for a favor after being an ahole about the whole thing. You can't make up how attorneys behave sometime. I had a neighbor who is a big time collector throughout the state of michigan and was friends with my ex-wife-just tolerated me but was cordial when we saw each other. I caught him doing some crazy stuff. He expected me to look the other way as we were neighbors and friends. Yeah, right. He broke the law against my client so I sued him. After that, he would flip me the bird or yell at me when he drove by my house when I was working in the yard. Attorneys, right? Th e profession is a good one to be a part of unless you deal with people like my neighbor and the guy soon to be in my video and on the membership site he watches. Stay tuned.

Brian Parker